Six
days before marking his first 100 days in office, President Trump had the
lowest approval rating of any president in the more than 70 years since such polls have been taken, this,
according to a pair of polls published Sunday. However, true to his past
reaction to bad news both in his business and personal life, he has been
tweeting about how great he is and how successful—showing, he says, the most achievements
of any president ever! So far, apparently, his hard-core base has been willing
to still believe in him, but will they continue to be satisfied with nothing
but hot air and self-promotion? About the only victory he can really point to
is the appointment of a Supreme Court justice, that accomplished by the
questionable shenanigans of the Senate, refusing to give a hearing to President
Obama’s nominee. I guess Trump cannot control his urge to brag about himself. Trump's popularity in polls has never risen, though
apparently his smallish hard-core base remains stubbornly loyal.
As Donald
Trump completes his first 100 days in office, he has, of course, characterized
them as the most successful ever in the history of the American presidency. By
any other measure, they have been one of the least successful, but who cares if
you are citing “alternative facts?” And when news media and think tanks
contradict Trump, he just attacks them as “fake news.” All his life, he has
been winging it, tricking others, and boasting about himself, so why stop now?
Vicariously, his base identifies with him and loves his boldness in saying
whatever he wants, whether true or not. But can the country and the world survive
a Trump presidency?
I’ve tried to imagine Donald Trump when he was a roly-poly baby
or a silly blond elementary school kid. He was probably a fairly likeable human
being back then—when did he start morphing into the obnoxious braggart and
bully that he has since become? Are his parents somehow to blame? When did he
become tone-deaf to how other people think and feel? How could the warped
development of someone like him be prevented? Now that he is 70 years old and
showing no signs so far of learning from the experience of actually being
president, it may be too late for him to change. Very sad for him, for his family including his wife and young son,
for our country, and for the world although perhaps Trump himself, who seems to
live exclusively in a virtual world inside his own imagination, feels no
sadness at all, though he says being president is harder than he had expected. I
will grant Mr. Trump one achievement since he has assumed the presidency: his
anti-immigration stance has had a psychological effect in reducing the numbers
of people trying to illegally cross our southern border. He doesn’t even need
that wall! And it’s better that he leaves details to others. Also, while chaos
may put his political adversaries (and friends) off guard and give a strategic
advantage as an opening gambit, some coherence needs to develop over time.
Obama may have been too predictable—mostly you knew where he stood and he
seemed to have a plan laid out. Trump
likes to upset the applecart with weird out-of-the blue tweets. I suppose his
followers like it that he can upset the political establishment and world
markets with just a simple tweet, sometimes containing bad grammar and misspellings.
Trump may be the law-and-order candidate
but when it comes to skirting the law himself, he doesn’t hesitate (though this
was taken down after protests, slowing that protests sometimes work):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-mar-a-lago-state-department_us_58fe4e4fe4b06b9cb9193b03?o1p&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-mar-a-lago-state-department_us_58fe4e4fe4b06b9cb9193b03?o1p&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
When Trump
gave a speech at the NRA, I would bet that the audience was not allowed to
carry guns. Why not, if guns are so protective and, of course, a patriotic constitutional
right under the Second Amendment? Concealed carry, open-carry, who cares, as
long as you have your firearm always at the ready, even on a college campus or
in church or at your bedside at night?
Say what you will about Donald Trump
and the Republican Party, the Democrats have been MIA. They seem to have been
confused and devastated and unsure about what to do next. Of course, we all
have to roll up our sleeves and not just lament, but get to work at the
grassroots level. I agree with West in the following article:
The Democrats delivered one thing in the past
100 days: disappointment
Cornel Westwhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-delivered-one-thing-100-days-disappointmenthttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-delivered-one-thing-100-days-disappointmentww.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-deliThe Democrats
delivered one thing in the past 100 days: disappointment | Cornel West |
Opinion | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-delivered-one-thing-100-days-disappointmentvered-one-thing-100-days-disappointmenthttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-delivered-one-thing-1
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-delivered-one-thing-100-days-disappointmentvered-one-thing-100-days-disappointmenthttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-delivered-one-thing-1
Bernie
is not the answer any more, neither is Hillary, but then who is? Any
volunteers? We Democrats need new faces, fresh blood, something to light a fire
under us. A dark horse! I don't think we’ve gotten over being stunned by
Hillary's loss, even though many folks weren't crazy about her, and not yet over
the shock of Trump's unimaginable ascendancy to the presidency--I still cannot
bring myself to actually say he won, because of his big loss of the popular
vote. As I've mentioned, I was in Chappaqua for a book talk the day after the
election where the whole town was in mourning. I've been pretty depressed
myself about the election ever since and Trump's performance hasn't improved my
mood. He's as crazy, dishonest, and unreliable as we had feared. But we
Democrats have to start climbing out of the slough of despond and get to work!
And do more than just sign petitions and march, because this administration and
this Congress don't care about any of that, they just care about their own voters
and campaign donations. Unfortunately, we here in DC are handicapped by being
dis-enfranchised. I’ve been waiting, looking for a silver lining with Trump, but
haven’t found it yet.
While reducing upper income tax brackets may promote some job
creation through rich peoples’ investments and purchases, giving tax breaks and
income support to lower income levels can also increase jobs by producing customers
for basic products they would be unable to afford otherwise like food, housing,
transportation, and child care. My vote instead would be for lower level tax
benefits—even subsidies—to promote more overall economic activity.
00-
As with Trump supporters here--or Brexit, or Le
Pen supporters in France—Hungary’s Prime
Minister Orban is playing on
people's suspicions and fears of outsiders. But nothing stands still. The
political pendulum does seem to swing back and forth--let's hope it's gone as
far as it can in this protectionist xenophobic direction and that a backlash
will push it again more toward the center--though not too far in the other
direction either, as that brings its own problems.
The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR,
NY Times, The Cost of Trump’s Retreat From
Rights
[Scathing article
about Trump administration’s human rights record.].html
ays-disappointmenthttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/24/democrats-Had
the opportunity to attend a talk and film showing by Dr. Marin Palous on Czech-Cuban
human rights collaboration at European Union Delegation headquarters. The
late Cuban democracy advocate Oswaldo
Paya had a chance to meet Vaclav Havel in Prague and their meeting was
filmed. (I also once met Paya in Cuba before his movement was underway, as
recounted in my Confessions book.)
It
turns out that FGM on some young
girls is being practiced in the US, despite being illegal. It would be even
more harmful for girls living here because it is not the cultural norm and so they
won’t have cultural and social support which may to some extent mitigate the
harm where it is widely practiced. Misery loves company. I do recall it was a
routine practice in South Sudan when I was there, sometimes with fatal
consequences, but not all tribes participated. At least one tribe whose members
I met there had another rite of passage for children of both genders, still
harmful, but much less so, namely extracting their 2 lower permanent front
teeth. Why or what that signified, I am not sure, but they were able to manage by
biting with side teeth. Scarring, ear piercing (I have that myself), and neck
stretching are other practices, though some are dying out. In the US and the
west, tattoos are in vogue. The girls in
my family all have them.
The
most drastic sort of body change now apparently gaining popularity is transgenderism, but not just
cross-dressing and passing for a person of the opposite sex, as happened at
times past—especially among women passing as men to engage in work open only to
men, such as joining the military or a ship’s crew. Now, hormones and surgery are available to
actually transform the physical body and probably even the emotions and
intellect in the direction of the desired gender. A hundred years ago, a man aspiring to become
female could not actually grow breasts and a woman aspiring to become male could
not grow a beard and deepen her voice. But the voice apparently doesn’t go in
the opposite direction—the male voice remains despite hormone treatment. Have you ever heard
Caitlyn Jenner being interviewed?
Sounds pretty much like Bruce.