Thursday, February 7, 2019

Shutdown Over for Now, The Wall, State of the Union, My Terrible Day, Maduro on the Ropes?, Trump Still with Us, Me-Too, Cuban Heroine, Socialism and Taxes, Gov. Norton’s Flub, Abortion Debate, My Honduran Mission


Finally, there was a temporary end to the temporary government shutdown. (Of course, everything in life is temporary, including Trump’s presidency, thank goodness.) Trump must be upset that a mere woman, Nancy Pelosi, has outmaneuvered him on “the wall.” That wall and MAGA hats have become unwelcome symbols for Trump himself, which is why many of us react viscerally to them. “The wall” fight is not so much about a physical barrier or the MAGA hat but that they represent everything we reject about the man himself. “Wall” support is stronger with Trump’s base in the Midwest than along the actual US-Mexico border. And Trump himself is a bigger national security threat than refugees and asylum seekers arriving at the border. Since probably more drugs and even people enter the US illegally by sea (who knows actually how many?), depriving the Coast Guard of pay, even temporarily, was not such a wise move.

When Trump started to give his State of the Union address, I turned off my radio, because I just could not stand to hear him. In snippets rebroadcast later, it sounded like he stuck to the teleprompter. He called for “unity,” meaning “do it my way.”

·         My terrible day was also something temporary, like the temporary government shutdown and, eventually, mercifully, the Trump administration. But it was quite challenging. Because of high winds and rain, I left early for an interpretation assignment for a therapy session at a private home. I needed to take 2 metros and a bus and walk several blocks to an address in NW DC. On the way to Eastern Market metro, right off the bat, a fierce wind turned my umbrella inside out, wrecking it, so I trashed it. An hour later, after walking to the address battered by freezing rain with no umbrella and climbing up 2 sets of stairs with no railings to the designated residence (only house on that hilly block with no stair rails), the mother of the child to receive therapy greeted me at the front door, telling me she doubted the therapist was coming. She showed me a text message (in English) on her phone: "Sorry, have to cancel today. Will re-schedule.” So, I turned around with the icy rain in my face and walked gingerly back downstairs, then traversed a few blocks to wait outside for the bus back to the metro station. I arrived home wet and cold to the bone. Is this what I signed up for when I agreed to become an on-call Spanish interpreter?

I almost never agree with anything done by the Trump administration, and usually oppose the US putting its thumb on the scales, especially in Latin America. But after helping Venezuelan asylum seekers, I do agree that it is past time for a change of government in Venezuela, a government that has brought death, repression, and economic ruin to a once prosperous nation. No one knows if the US tactic of recognizing an alternative president will work without leading to more bloodshed, but some other countries are following suit by recognizing the opposition, while Russia and China have redoubled their support of Maduro. It would not be prudent for the US to intervene militarily, which would only increase sympathy for Maduro, and I would hope that isn’t being considered. Wouldn’t it be great if we could get Trump to step down voluntarily, as well as Maduro? Of course, any change of leadership in Venezuela will have an immediate effect on Cuba, which relies heavily on the Maduro government for moral support and oil.

Trump seems not to be particularly enjoying his presidency, though he did beat the odds in achieving it. He reportedly spends much of his day occupied with “executive time,” that is, just being left alone and uninterrupted while he watches TV or naps. Luck and sheer bravado seem to have propelled him forward. He is an unattractive, lazy, and emotionally and mentally challenged guy who happened to have had a rich father who taught him some dirty tricks and how to take advantage of odd flukes that opened up opportunities. Donald’s blatant lies and cheating are almost breathtaking, yet he pushes forward without apparent regret, shame, or empathy. Even efforts by staff and confidants to curb his excesses seem fairly ineffective as he often simply ignores them or contradicts them publicly. He likes being an outlaw and having someone like that in the presidency has been nearly catastrophic. Nonetheless, a fairly steady economy and some external controls (laws, courts, political opponents), as well as some internal controls that we cannot see, have kept him somewhat in check for now. But Vladimir Putin, who has known Trump for years, must be chuckling to himself about how well his schemes have worked out to undermine the US with nary a shot being fired, inflicting damage even beyond his wildest dreams.

Donald Trump is clownish, ridiculous figure. Almost a caricature, whom most people around the world cannot take seriously, but to whom they must defer because of his position. He lies so much that even his followers don’t believe much of what he says. I am now reading Bob Woodward’s book Fear: Trump in the White House, Trump has been good for book publishers, also for news outlets. A record number of tell-all books have come out of the churning vortex of the White House staff, but Trump scarcely recalls meeting any of their authors.    

Donald Trump has also indicated that he hardly knew Roger Stone, just like he barely knew Michael Cohen. As for women to whom he has paid thousands of dollars to keep quiet about sex, he’s never even met them. I’d thought that George W. Bush was our worst modern president, but I was wrong.

Though I’m hardly a fan of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, as the mother myself of sons/grandsons, as well as of daughters, I don’t think that men should automatically be deemed sexual aggressors whenever they are accused. Probably regarding human behavior in the aggregate, nothing is 100% true or false. While most sexual assault accusations by women against men are true (and most are never reported), a few outliers may actually be malicious or false and some may even be ambiguous. If the me-too movement is now changing the view of acceptable romantic overtures and sexual consent, then a new consensus needs to be forged. Men and women will continue to seek out romantic and sexual partnerships, so what are the new rules of the game? Just asking someone to go out on a date should not be construed as sexual harassment, assuming it’s not overly persistent or tied to a job. There still needs to be some acceptable system of give-and-take to bring men and women together romantically.

Even a man I had met and admired (even for his swimming prowess, see him in my Confessions book), namely, former Nobel laureate and Costa Rican president Oscar Arias, has not been exempt from sexual assault allegations.

Sirley Avila is a woman from a rural community in central Cuba. She had spoken out on behalf of school children and had her left hand severed by a machete and had other serious injuries inflicted for her trouble. She has been living in exile in south Florida for the last two years. Just now, she dared make her first return trip to Cuba to be with her very ill mother and was able to come back without incident. I had written about her previously in the Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-revolution-with-promise_b_9801712.html

While some Democratic lawmakers are calling for more taxes on the wealthy, there will obviously be strong resistance to any such efforts. After all, didn’t business leaders and wealthy individuals just push through a big tax break mainly for themselves? Even the poor may identify with rich folks, aspiring or dreaming of becoming just like them in a mythical future, imagining living in a nirvana where their every whim is satisfied. Of course, the uber wealthy don’t actually have problem-free lives nor can most people ever expect to achieve that economic status, but such hopes do fuel the purchase of lottery tickets and gambling. It has been found that after Americans achieve an annual income in the $75,000-plus range, their sense of wellbeing and life satisfaction are not measurably enhanced by higher incomes.

At the same time, I am well aware that so-called “socialist” nations like the USSR, Mao’s China, Eastern Germany, Cuba, and, now, Venezuela, have miserably failed most citizens. “Socialism” encompasses a wide range of definitions, but it does not have to go as far as in the examples cited. Most desirable is a more moderate redistribution providing health and social services, as in Nordic countries, which have high taxes together with businesses operating along conventional capitalist lines. Trickle-down economics has been proven ineffective. Nor have Trump’s tax cuts have substantially increased investment. Instead, corporations and wealthy people seem to mostly be holding onto their wealth or parking it offshore.

What does government owe to its citizens and residents? Safety above all. After that, what about basic food, medical care, education, and housing? Those are considered key and are provided or guaranteed by a number of advanced nations. What about legal aid for the indigent? What about parental leave, higher education, and internet as proposed by some lawmakers? Where do government guarantees go too far? What should be left to charity, family and neighbors, or personal initiative? These matters are all up for discussion and debate.

Va. Governor Ralph Northam may well have moved on since a racist photo was posted in his medical school yearbook, but he was no callow youth at the time. Whether or not he actually appears in the photo, it was still posted on his page. And however progressive he may have become since, his tone-deaf citing of his appearance in blackface as Michael Jackson only worsened his position. Yet, now his African American Lt. Governor and Attorney General are also tainted. If all three were resign, then a Republican would be next in line, so I guess they should all remain in office, since they are not resigning anyway. Maybe the furor will blow over, but certainly their standing has been diminished.

Here’s an article about the abortion debate that expresses much of my own perspective, as both a birth and an adoptive parent. No, I don’t think we should consider every fertilized ovum, every embryo, a “person,” though it could become one. But where a fetus has developed sensations, especially pain, and could survive outside the womb, then abortion would be killing it (or, rather, killing him or her). Can a consensus emerge on this contentious issue?

Okay, folks, I am now off to Honduras on my annual volunteer humanitarian and medical brigade mission. Will report back here after my return.