Whenever Martin
Luther King Day rolls around, I am reminded of standing with my late former
husband at the edge of the crowd as King delivered his “I Have A Dream Speech”
back in 1963. Little did we know then that it would be such an historic
occasion. When Barack Obama made a commemorative
speech 50 years later, security was much tighter than on the original day. Of
course, both the original and Obama’s commemoration took place in August, quite
a contrast from the weather on MLKIng Day, based on King’s birthday, in 2019,
so very frigid.
The weather on this year’s King holiday reminded
me of the bitter cold when we were squeezed together in Obama’s first record-breaking
inaugural crowd, which my daughter Stephanie had come out from Hawaii to join.
In 2017, I saw Trump’s pitiful inaugural crowd on a fairly balmy January day while
I was walking in the neighborhood, but the next day, at the women’s march, we
were out in full force.
Happened recently to run across a reference
to the whistling language of a group
of Mexican mountain dwellers, Mazateo,
communication that carries across long distances, and a lovely sounding
language that is dying out. If you Google “Mexico’s whistling language” and
open a Facebook video there, you will find and hear it.
I gave up my driver’s license recently because
the requirements for renewing it were too onerous, especially since I haven’t
had a car for 20 years anyway (before Peace Corps). Meanwhile, apparently 97-year-old Prince Philip enjoys driving around alone not wearing a seatbelt,
getting immediately back behind the wheel right after an accident that injured people
in another car. What are the authorities to do in such a case? Only the queen
can lay down the law, but she herself, at age 92 and with no driver’s license,
has also been seen out driving alone failing to use a seatbelt. Even royalty does
not enjoy divine protection while driving. Wouldn’t it be an irony if the
queen’s reign were to end with her involvement in a traffic accident?
One of my sociology professors at UC Berkeley
many years ago, Nathan Glazer, has
died at age 95.
I was surprised and slightly flattered when a
couple from Central America, when I was serving as interpreter during a home
therapy session for their son, asked me if I were Honduran. Maybe after Peace
Corps and subsequent visits, aspects of Honduran
speech have rubbed off?
Speaking of Honduras, I do plan to go again this year as a medical brigade
volunteer. I’ve already booked my ticket and have ordered a new wheelchair to
go with a walker that I already have. I won’t mention the exact trip dates on
this forum, but will report back with photos after my return. I’m praying that
the government shutdown ends before I have to leave.
The shutdown’s
effects are being felt far and wide, including by my daughter and her
husband, working as environmental biologists in Hawaii.
I’m familiar with the upscale Nairobi neighborhood where the recent
Somali terrorist hotel attack occurred and have had coffee in the Westgate
shopping mall where even more people were killed in 2013. That area has been
the pride of the city, but terrorists are making it a scary place. I can well
imagine that the American killed this time might have been attracted to that
neighborhood.
As I must have
mentioned before, Amnesty International,
where I have been a decades’ long volunteer, opposes embargoes as a matter of
principle. Now there seems to be a switch occurring among Cuban Americans. (I
suspect part of the diaspora’s softer line toward the Cuban regime may have to
do with the fact that a Castro is no longer officially in charge, although Raul
Castro is still calling the shots behind the scenes.)
I sent the results
of this poll to a number of Cuban Americans. Most are still strongly in favor
of the embargo, but one was opposed,
feeling that it gives the Cuban government an excuse for everything that’s
going wrong in Cuba.
More Cuban-Americans reverse support for ending
embargo, poll says | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/us/frustration-over-lack-of-democratic-reform-in-cuba-fuels-growing-support-for-u-s-trade-embargo-among-south-florida-cuban-americans-poll
https://www.foxnews.com/us/frustration-over-lack-of-democratic-reform-in-cuba-fuels-growing-support-for-u-s-trade-embargo-among-south-florida-cuban-americans-poll
In my volunteer role as Caribbean Coordinator for Amnesty Int’L USA, I’ve received a petition on behalf of six Cubans being detained in immigration in Louisiana.
The sign they are holding says
“We are Cuban immigrants, not delinquents.”
[Have tried to correct spacing, if it comes out wrong again, I give up.]
I am trying to get pro bono
lawyers for them, just as I would for any other immigration detainee.
With all the attention now
on asylum claims, I have done interpretation both in person and at the border
telephonically. But I never know what the final decision is in each case.
As has been pointed out by
immigration observers, people can and do enter
the US illegally with little problem if by sea. Some are intercepted by the
Coast Guard, but many are not. A wall along the Mexican border would not curb
that avenue.
Trump may be clinging so
tightly onto his wall because he needs to keep his base faithful, as that is
the only support he now has, which is also keeping many Republicans in line for
fear of alienating that voting sector. Nancy
Pelosi has shown that she is a much more savvy dealmaker than Trump ever
was. It was so childish of him to cancel her overseas trip in retaliation. I do
salute now-Senator Mitt Romney for
breaking ranks with McConnell and openly criticizing Trump. But Romney has supported
Trump on “the wall.”
If, indeed, trolls
intervened in the Alabama senatorial
contest on behalf of the winning Democrat, that just shows that both sides
can play that game. It was much less extensive and serious than Russian
intervention into national elections, so there is no moral equivalency, but
still shows that on-line attempts to sway elections are open to any and all
wrongdoers.
Can I get through s blog posting without any further
reference to you-know who? Probably
not, because even when his name is not mentioned, he is in the news and daily
making a negative impact on so many lives. I attended the first women’s march
the day after the inauguration, but no longer have had the energy to attend
follow up marches which seem to make no impact.
Very appropriate to refer to the president as
“Forrest Trump.” He cannot put
together a coherent sentence or spell ordinary words and he lies so much that even
his hardcore followers don’t believe much of what he says. His staff do their
best to cover up for him and to pretend everything is normal until they just can’t
take it anymore and quit. So why should Americans believe what he says about
the border wall? Trump is not any sort of deal maker. He wants to “negotiate”
with Democrats only after they
give in to his border wall demands. What kind of “deal” is that? Then, what
leverage would they have? He would have already gotten what he wanted. He needs
a face -saving way out of the impasse he has now created. In pediatric therapy,
advice is to not give in to a tantrum or bad behavior, as it just encourages a child
to continue. Making a non-negotiable demand and walking out of a meeting is not
how to make a “deal.” Deals, especially in government, imply negotiations to
arrive at a mutually acceptable
solution, not one side holding the other hostage and holding out until “winning”
by getting exactly what he wants. Is Trump too old and stubborn to learn more
effective tactics?
Many of us, probably a majority of Americans,
don’t want a massive border wall. We
consider further extending the “wall”, already in existence in many places, a
waste of money and undesirable. It would be anti-environmental, ugly,
unfriendly, and destructive. Some existing barriers might be fortified or even
extended in a few places, as has been done before, but physical barriers are
not the main way to keep most unauthorized immigrants out. And is keeping them
all out even desirable? Trump’s own properties employ them. Many Americans have
been against “the wall” ever since Trump first proposed it and, as opposition
to him grows, the wall as a symbol of his presidency and his intransigence
becomes increasingly important to oppose and defeat. And like the boy who cried
“wolf,” Trump is not believable when he calls the migration at the southern
border an “emergency” that only his “big, beautiful wall” can stop. (It’s
actually a smaller “invasion” than in former years.) Conservative websites are
selling “Build the wall” mugs. Part of the objection to the wall is an objection
to Trump himself.
However, it
certainly is not helpful in opposing “the wall,” that a new migrant caravan is setting
out from Honduras for the US. https://abcn.ws/2ANcDHS
Honduran
migrant caravans are rooted in Hondurans’ real fears and frustrations, as well
as their exaggerated dream of finding an easier in a life in an idealized USA.
But participants are also being manipulated by political forces in Honduras
opposed to the current president. The caravans are not a
spontaneous phenomenon.
The announcement of another
Honduran migrant caravan is being made, in part, to embarrass the current
president of Honduras and challenge Donald Trump. But some in Trump’s hardcore
base may now be finding that the lack of a border wall actually affects them
less than having crops they cannot sell or not being paid during the furlough.
At worst, for most who oppose illegal immigration, it’s simply a matter of putting
up with the annoyance of hearing people speaking Spanish and feeling those
folks don’t belong here. Meanwhile, many of these same anti-immigration
zealots, like Trump himself, rely on the undocumented to provide restaurant
meals, do construction and landscaping tasks, and take care of children and
elders. In light of these competing realities, maybe “the wall” does not seem
so important after all.
A friend in another state asked me about the origins
of the migrant caravans from Honduras and about Honduran politics in general.
Rather than reinvent the wheel, if you are interested in more detail. I’m pasting here my reply to him, including a
little in Spanish (he knows Spanish), as this narrative gives my take on the
current situation there. My message to him below is shown in blue lettering, which I hope comes out blue on the
blog. We shall see.
Now, as for your question (not bothering here
with accent marks, tildes), gang members are active in Guatemala, El Salvador,
and Honduras and can readily cross borders by just showing an ID from one of
those countries. Gangs and crime have existed for decades in those countries
and too many people are armed, so gun deaths are much higher than even here in
the US. (And the guns mostly come from the US.) In Tegucigalpa and other major
Honduran cities, there are armed guards in banks (and patrons must go through
metal detectors), Western Union offices, pharmacies, and grocery stores, that
is, almost anywhere that money changes hands. Despite or because of this, there
is a high gun death rate. Many of the gangs got an infusion of new
sophisticated members when Latino gang members were deported after prison from
the US, especially from California. All three countries, Honduras included,
have high rates of poverty and a big divide between the wealthy, who have
servants and sometimes armed guards outside their homes, and the more numerous poor,
Some of the folks I stay with in Honduras are in the wealthy category with
live-in servants. A few might be considered middle-class—i.e. a family where
the wife is a hospital nurse and the husband works for the Honduran Red Cross
(he once worked for the Peace Corps before the corps left Honduras). They have
2 kids in a private school, but not a fancy bilingual private school. A (poor)
woman comes in some days to help with housework. Another middle-class family
sells roast chickens and other food 7 days a week in a stall in an open market.
Two of their daughters are physicians. A small-town man with four kids plays in
a band at parties and also fixes electronics in his home and does some
farming—the family still has an outdoor shower and latrine. So, it’s a mixed
group of people, all aspiring to do better economically, but facing an uphill
battle, just as here, only much more so. Bank teller or fast food attendant,
any job that pays regular wages, is prized.
Probably most poor people, especially if they have TV, aspire to live in the US. They may be receiving remittances from relatives there or else know someone who is. Few people go hungry, but getting enough to eat is sometimes difficult and, especially in the countryside, where the diet can be monotonous: handmade corn tortillas, boiled beans, and rice. I’ve mentioned that in my Honduras book.
Politically, the divisions in Honduras are as stark as here. Soon after I left the Peace Corps, a member of the legislature belonging to the Liberal Party, Manuel Zelaya, probably equivalent to the Democrats here, ran for president against the National Party (Republican equivalent) candidate. Certain towns or regions traditionally favor one party or the other, regardless of local economics. (My two PC sites of El Triunfo and La Esperanza were mostly Nationalist strongholds despite high poverty.) Zelaya had been accused of corruption before his presidential bid, but seemed to have overcome that. He was from a wealthy ranching family and his father had spent some time in prison because of the deaths of folks occupying his land, Traditionally and constitutionally in Honduras (and in much of Latin America), presidents are limited to one 4-year consecutive term, so in Honduras, presidents of each party typically alternated. When Zelaya ran for president, it was the Liberal Party’s turn. Also, Zelaya got help financing his campaign from a well-to-do former Peace Corps volunteer who had originally offered to finance public libraries in Honduras, but switched his support to Zelaya (a decision he reportedly regretted later) just as I had finished helping a local group submit a library funding proposal in El Triunfo, my first PC site. (We still have books collected, but no library.)
Midway through his presidency, Zelaya suddenly became an ally of Hugo Chavez, who sold him cheap oil. This alliance upset the political establishment, which became even more upset when Zelaya declared he was going to change the constitution to allow himself to run for a second consecutive term. You may recall the so-called “coup” (depends on who is calling it) whereby he was taken out of the country in his pajamas. Zelaya, who has a black mustache and wears a cowboy hat, came back to Honduras and has been a member of the legislature from a new party that he created, Libre, from which he has run his wife as a presidential candidate. But by taking votes away from the Liberals in a 3-party race, Nationalist Juan Orlando Hernandez (JOH) won.
Furthermore, Hernandez, with considerable opposition, managed to actually get the constitution changed to allow himself a second term, which he is occupying right now. His main second-term rival was Salvador Nasralla, a sports’ TV host who had boasted publicly about his sexual prowess and was supported by Zelaya. I polled some Honduran friends on the contest. Below are four replies (misspellings are not mine—because Spanish is mostly phonetic, folks don’t bother to learn spelling).
1.Nasralla + Mel Zelaya + Juan Orlando Hernandez = Insuficiente para el Presidente que Honduras necesita en los próximos 4 años. Si gana Nasralla = Gobierno INCIERTO por la incompatibilidad ideológica de Nasralla con Zelaya. Gobierno del aceite con vinagre.
Si gana JOH = Gobierno
INGOBERNABLE por inconstitucional y porque la mayoría de
los hondureños votantes estan en contra.
POSIBLE Solucion: Segunda vuelta solo para la
eleccion Presidencial (que no esta en la Constitucion Hondureña) encabezada por
un Tribunal Supremo Electoral INTERNACIONAL
2. La mejor opción es JOHA
pues de quedar Nasrala seremos igual a Venezuela.
pues de quedar Nasrala seremos igual a Venezuela.
3. aqui estan ocurriendo muchas cosas en lo politico las autoridades estan siendo prudentes con dar los resultados finales de la eleccion presidencial por obias razones , nosotros no pudimos votar por que martin se enfermo y estuvo hospitalizado todo el domingo. espero que esta situacin en mi pais se calme y podamos seguir trabajando como siempre
4. Hola Bárbara... Ninguno de los dos es lo mejor...pero el menos peor es el actual Presidente JOH, pues Nasralla es un títere del ex presidente Manuel Zelaya y ahorita en las elecciones volvimos a ver los mismos actores y seguidores de Zelaya que meses y años atras habían desaparecido y de ganar Nasralla volverían a posiciones importantes dentro del Gobierno...haciéndonos recordar el Gobierno de Zelaya. El Tribunal Superior de Elecciones acaba de declarar a JOH como presidente electo... Nasralla viajó hoy a Washington a denunciar el fraude ante la OEA y otras organizaciones... creo que al final nada cambiará y luego de algunas semanas de protestas, todo volverá a la calma, similar a lo que pasó despues de la destitución de Zelaya en el 2009.
Of
course, the election was not run again and Hernandez was declared the winner in
January 2018. Last Feb., I was in Honduras and polled people informally,
including cab drivers. Many had not voted because they didn’t like either
candidate. Hernandez appeared in TV press conferences and was 100% more
articulate than Trump, but that’s not saying much. He has a histrionic delivery
style that doesn’t appeal to me. He seems to have allied himself with Trump,
but I doubt that Trump knows who he is or cares. Hernandez has a reputation for
being hard on crime and the murder rate has actually gone down, but many accuse
him of having too heavy a hand.
Meanwhile, Zelaya, still in the legislature, has not remained quiet. He and his followers are reportedly behind the organization of the migrant “caravans,” designed to challenge both Hernandez and Trump. Impoverished Hondurans, who have always aspired to go to the US and who may have relatives already there, but who lack the means to pay a smuggler, have eagerly joined in and, passing through Guatemala, have picked up other would-be migrants there. Some people may be fleeing gangs and domestic violence, but probably the majority are economic migrants.
That
may be more than you need to know, but that’s the situation. Now, what should
be done? Not a wall, but programs to help Central America develop local
opportunities would be best. How about $5 billion for that instead of a wall?
There is another crisis in Central America that has not gotten much press, namely the ongoing uprising against Daniel Ortega which has now claimed more than 500 lives. An OAS body has been expelled. (Ortega has also been consistently accused of years of child rape by his stepdaughter Zoilamerica Narvaez, charges which he has vehemently denied.) Nicaragua has an electoral law, allowing the candidate with the most votes, not a majority, to win. After his defeat by Violeta in 1990 when the opposition united behind UNO (and when I served as an election observer there), Ortega ran twice again for president but lost. Then in 2006, he won with only about 37% of the vote. The opposition did not learn from the experience of UNO in 1990. Ortega changed the constitution so that he could run again, packed the courts, and now, in his 3rd term, has named his wife as vice president.
Nicaraguan friends have appealed to me to come back and help them once again while I am in Honduras. I will be traveling very close to the border, but hardly have the time and energy to take on that fight again. They did not earn the lesson of UNO, though admittedly, some folks were quite young in 1990. In any case, it would take an enormous organized and coordinated effort that I don’t have the energy to undertake now. Let others do it this time. Nor will I take on the Honduran establishment, preferring to focus on my very small, targeted medical brigade tasks where I can see the immediate result.